有一逻辑题如下:
When limitations were in effect on nuclear-arms testing, people tended to save more of their money, but when nuclear-arms testing increased, people tended to spend more of their money. The perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe, therefoer, decreases the willingness of people to postpone consumption for the sake of saving money.
The argument above assumes that
(A) the perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe has increased over the years.
(B) most people support the development of nuclear arms.
(C) people's perception of the threat of nuclear catastrophe depends on the amount of nuclear-arms testing being done.
(D) the people who saved the most money when nuclear-arms testing was limited were the ones who support such limitations.
(E) there are more consumer gods available when nuclear-arms testing increases.
答案选C.
偶认为因为The perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe decreases the willingness of people to postpone consumption for the sake of saving money.则暗示着the perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe has increased.
为何A不对?
**偶也觉得C好象只是联系了threat of nuclear catastrophe和nuclear-arms testing.
请问如何作答?
[em06]
A 是无关选项。
它没有在perception-----amount of nuclear-arms testing 之间打起桥梁。
原文的结构是这样的：
数量---消费
由此推出：perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe---消费。
在数量---？----消费。之间，缺的是什么？是桥梁：数量=perceived threat of nuclear catastrophe
