返回列表 发帖

狒狒一道逻辑题,求教

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act, the United States automobile industry argued that meeting the act’s standards for automobile emissions was neither economically feasible nor environmentally necessary. However, the catalytic converter, invented in 1967, enabled automakers to meet the 1970 standards efficiently. Currently, automakers are lobbying against the government’s attempt to pass legislation that would tighten restrictions on automobile emissions. The automakers contend that these new restrictions would be overly expensive and unnecessary to efforts to curb air pollution. Clearly, the automobile industry’s position should not be heeded.

Which one of the following, if true, lends the most support to the automakers’ current position?

A.The more stringent the legislation restricting emission becomes, the more difficult it becomes for automakers to provide the required technology economically.

B.Emissions-restriction technology can often be engineered so as to avoid reducing the efficiency with which an automobile uses fuel.

C.Not every new piece of legislation restricting emission requires new automotive technology in order for automakers to comply with it.

D.The more automobiles there are on the road, the more stringent emission restrictions must be to prevent increased overall air pollution.

E.Unless forced to do so by the government, automakers rarely make changes in automotive technology that is not related to profitability.

请帮忙说下思路以及解决办法。。
收藏 分享

这个题选A吧
我是这样想的
汽车生产厂家的position是新的条列会很贵而且不必要。那么选项就应该与这个有关,只有A
而另一种方法应该更保证一点。
作者认为70年的act就被反对因为经济和不必要,但是一个东东的发明使这反对的原因不成立。现在汽车生产厂家又以同样的理由反对现在的条例,所以不要理会。作者这里有个类比,70年和现在。
而题目相当于weaken作者,所以要指出两个事件是不一样的。

不知道对不对哈,等待大牛

TOP

我觉得答案是D...不知道对不对...

TOP

D 稍微不靠谱了吧。。这道support没有因果推理,那就直接strengthen它的结论好了 选A

TOP

automaker 的立场是新的规定太expensive 了, 选项A说标准越严格,所能提供的技术越昂贵,因此支持了automaker的立场

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看