返回列表 发帖

大全1-16

这题搜索后大家对题意都没有定论。第三党到底是不是只吸收了2党中的1党的部分选民,还是从两大党中都吸收了一点?请问C为什么不对?我觉得题目说了只从2党选民中吸收啊。

In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.

(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.

(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.B

(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

收藏 分享

第三党是只吸收了2党中的1党的部分选民 based on the question.

C is an assumption, but you cannot get this from the question, it's irrelevant.

TOP

我觉得C是个support题的答案....可是题里问的是infer....

不过还是不很明白这道题,顶起,哪个好心人来给解释一下~

TOP

我认为这段话的意思是:引入第三党参选可以为的是缓解只有两个党派角逐的局面。如果这两个党派能分出胜负,其实就不需要引入第三党,吸收选民,一边决出胜负了。
举例就像公司里面3位股东,两个占40%股份,一个占20%。而不是只有两个股东各占50%。因为如果这两个股东意见分歧,其实就根本无法做出决定。但是引入第三方就可能解决
所以得出结论:在没有引进第三党参选,之前两大党是势均力敌的。
B,If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote

TOP

C是不对的

我认为C是不对的,因为原文中说The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate。用的词是always。就是说有例外,至于例外是也选择了其他党派的人,还是说吸引了原来弃权,两党都没有投的人不能确定。
但是(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.有了will not 就是说不会吸引没有投票的人,说的绝对了
和原文的always冲突
B还有一点好,选B的话就可以规避掉第三党派到底是仅仅吸引一个党派的人,还是说两个党派都吸引了的不确定性。B说的是引进第三党之前的状况。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看