求助作文-1

ookko

“If the paper from every morning edition of the nation’s largest newspaper were collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, about 5 million trees would be saved each year. This kind of recycling is unnecessary, however, since the newspaper maintains its own forests to ensure an uninterrupted supply of paper.” （argument)

我的想法：
1、有充足供应和进行回收之间没有因果关系。你可以有充足供应，但是你也可以更环保
2、没有证据证明，你有森林就一定能够供应充足。

只想到了这两点，觉得写不够字数阿。请大家斧正。

花儿笑

基本跟你的想法差不多

myice

哇？作文题，大家围观一下

James

First of all, the arguer assumes that the only standard for evaluating whether recycling is unnecessary is whether the newspaper maintains its own forest to ensure an uninterrupted supply of paper; however, the arguer does not provide any evidence to prove such assumption.

Second of all, even we accept the assumption mentioned above, the arguer still fails to convince us that the forests maintained by the newspaper could ensure an uninterrupted supply of paper in the future.

Last but not least, even we accept both hypotheses above, the aruger still fails to consider other factos that could have influence on this decision, such as political reasons. (这一段纯粹是凑数了 哈哈)

希望这样能帮你：）

kakadongdong

哇塞，James真是牛人呀

s

很酷