返回列表 发帖

gdw-3-32

Q32:

Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

ans:A

为什么呀?不明白!!!!

收藏 分享

提干分析说没有了college-level courses ,最终会事与愿违,导致犯罪率攀升,这里的假设是没有该course, 不会导致一些人避免一些犯罪. 呵呵,,拗口了些. 如果没有该假设, 取消了该course, 好些人就being deterred from some crimes, then the crime rate is reduced, which is just opposite to the argument conclusion, right?

TOP

ding!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看