我的理解:
1)3% equided RD, 33% of those ticked equided RD.
从这个信息中可以推出来“ those that equided RD are more likely to be
ticked”,这就是前提了
2)题干的结论是“those that equided RD are more likely to exceed speed
limits”
3)这两者之间没有任何逻辑关联,所以需要架桥,即those ticked are more
likely to exceed speed limit.
4)换言之:A:美国人比较有钱;B:美国人比较浪费;
如果A-->B,那么需要一个假设:“有钱的人比较浪费” |