返回列表 发帖

求助:gwd-29-Q6,why not C?

GWD27-Q 3 to Q6:

Two opposing scenarios, the “arboreal” hypothesis and the “cursorial” hypothesis, have traditionally been put forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The “arboreal” hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing trees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers: the height of trees provides a good starting place for launching flight, especially through gliding. As feathers became larger over time, flapping flight evolved and birds finally became fully air-borne. This hypothesis makes intuitive sense, but certain aspects are troubling. Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously arboreal adaptations, such as feet fully adapted for perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, but no convincing analysis has demonstrated how Archaeopteryx would have both climbed and flown with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than a few meters in the environments where Archaeopteryx fossils have been found. Even if the animals could climb trees, this ability is not synonymous with gliding ability. (Many small animals, and even some goats and kangaroos, are capable of climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides, Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hind limbs.

   The “cursorial”(running) hypothesis holds that small dinosaurs ran along the ground and stretched out their arms for balance as they leaped into the air after insect prey or, perhaps, to avoid predators. Even rudimentary feathers on forelimbs could have expanded the arm’s surface area to enhance lift slightly. Larger feathers could have increased lift incrementally, until sustained flight was gradually achieved. Of course, a leap into the air does not provide the acceleration produced by dropping out of a tree; an animal would have to run quite fast to take off. Still, some small terrestrial animals can achieve high speeds. The cursorial hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that the immediate theropod dinosaur ancestors of birds were terrestrial, and they had the traits needed for high lift off speeds: they were small, agile, lightly built, long-legged, and good runners. And because they were bipedal, their arms were free to evolve flapping flight, which cannot be said for other reptiles of their time.

 --------------------------------------------------------------------

Q 6: The passage suggests which of the following regarding the climbing ability of Archaeopteryx?

A.    Its ability to climb trees was likely hindered by the presence of incipient feathers on its forelimbs.

B.    It was probably better at climbing trees than were its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins.

C.    It had certain physical adaptations that suggest it was skilled at climbing trees.

D.    Scientists have recently discovered fossil evidence suggesting it could not climb trees.

E.     Scientists are uncertain whether it was capable of climbing trees

why not C, but E?

收藏 分享

请仔细阅读,科学家发现的化石是证明始祖鸟不能滑行而不是不能爬树的。
 Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hind limbs.

这句话说名科学家还搞不清楚到底能不能爬树:Even if the animals could climb trees.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看