返回列表 发帖

feifei-37

37. Editorialist: Drivers with a large number of demerit points who additionally have been convicted of a serious driving-relative offense should either be sentenced to jail or be forced to receive driver reeducation, since to do otherwise would be to allow a crime to go unpunished. Only if such drivers are likely to be made more responsible drivers should driver re-education be recommended for them. Unfortunately, it is always almost impossible to make drivers with a large number of demerit points more responsible drivers.

If the editorialist’s statements are true, they provide the most support for which one of the following?

(A) Drivers with a large number of demerit points who have been convicted of a serious driving-related offense should be sent to jail.

(B) Driver re-education offers the best chance of making drivers with a large number of demerit points responsible drivers.

(C) Driver re-education is not a harsh enough punishment for anyone convicted of a serious driving-related offense who has also

(D) Driver re-education should not be recommended for those who have committed no serious

(E) Drivers with a larger number of demerit points but no conviction for a serious driving-related offense should receive driver re-education rather than jail

请帮我指正,C错误在哪里?

我认为这里说有罚分的司机有2中惩罚1送监狱,2重新驾驶员教育,而且说了只有当这些司机有可能以后变得更加有责任感,才能去再教育。。

那C错再哪里了》

收藏 分享

有罚分的司机有2中惩罚1送监狱,2重新驾驶员教育,而且说了只有当这些司机有可能以后变得更加有责任感,才能去再教育。。所以他们都该进监狱 A
欢迎大家来语法区交流

TOP

两种方式都是很严厉的惩罚,原文已经表示的很清楚了,C在这点上不符合原文的意思,但是任何方式也不能让这些司机变得更有责任感,所以还不如送到监狱去

TOP

37. Editorialist: Drivers with a large number of demerit points(记作A) who additionally have been convicted of a serious driving-relative offense(记作B) should either be sentenced to jail (记作C)or be forced to receive driver reeducation(记作D), since to do otherwise would be to allow a crime to go unpunished. Only if such drivers are likely to be made more responsible drivers(记作E) should driver re-education be recommended for them. Unfortunately, it is always almost impossible to make drivers with a large number of demerit points more responsible drivers.

根据文中的句子,现有的关系是

AB-〉C+ D(即AB-〉C,AB-〉D或者AB-〉CD)

D-〉E

A-〉E不成立

下面我们看看具体的选择项:

(A)AB-〉C,正确。因为如果AB-〉D成立,则AB->E成立,而这与A-〉E不成立矛盾,所以AB-〉D与AB-〉CD都不成立,所以选择项正确

(B)A-〉E,显然与已经条件矛盾,错误

(C)not(C+D)->allow a crime to go unpunished,文中并没有对两者的harsh进行展开或者比较

(D)not(B)->not(D),根据已经条件没有这个结论

(E)A和not(B)的交集->not(c)和D的交集,根据已经条件没有这个结论

我做的时侯就是先把A推出来然后就没有看下面的,也没有时间的说。总结来看,这种能用推导的题目一般第一个或者第二个就是答案。

欢迎讨论

TOP

推断题,可以用费费的无关词排除法啊~

题目中只是说了 送进监狱和重新教育 是两种惩罚。 并没有提到这种惩罚是否严重

TOP

Only if such drivers are likely to be made more responsible drivers should driver re-education be recommended for them.

这句话是什么意思,能解释一下吗?

是不是可以这么理解:

drivers should driver re-education be recommended for them,Only if such drivers are likely to be made more responsible 。

如果是这样的话,那a答案就优于c了。

TOP

不懂,另外

drivers should driver re-education be recommended for them,

正常的语序是不是这样:drivers should be recommended driver re-education for them。

大家帮帮忙,说两句吧

TOP

C.  Driver re-education is not a harsh enough punishment for anyone convicted of a serious driving-related offense who has also

这个C选项中的 who has also. 修饰的是什么?

who has also之前都理解,但是加了who has also, 变得云里雾里了。

nn帮我解释一下好吗?

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看