有什么好处之类的，剩下3个都很好排除
有一道题说科学家发表论文什么的，好多词不认识，大概是说由于发论文的数量对于hire和promote科学家有帮助，有些ambitious的科学家（老见这个词了……）要把一些科研成果拆散了发表论文，也就是说把一篇论文发成好几篇，问这样做的可能性是基于对什么的accuracy的评估（极为拗口的一个问题），我就选了“考核者更看重论文的数量而不是质量”
33. GWD21-Q33: One of the limiting factors in human physical performance is the amount of oxygen that is absorbed by the muscles from the bloodstream. Accordingly, entrepreneurs have begun selling at gymnasiums and health clubs bottles of drinking water, labeled “SuperOXY,” that has extra oxygen dissolved in the water. Such water would be useless in improving physical performance, however, since
the only way to get oxygen into the bloodstream so that it can be absorbed by the muscles is through the lungs.
Which of the following, if true, would serve the same function in the argument as the statement in boldface? A. the water lost in exercising can be replaced with ordinary tap water B. the amount of oxygen in the blood of people who are exercising is already more than the muscle cells can absorb C. world-class athletes turn in record performances without such water D. frequent physical exercise increases the body’s ability to take in and use oxygen E. lack of oxygen is not the only factor limiting human physical performance 说成年人几乎都没有儿童时期的记忆，而人应该是从5，6岁就有记忆力。问解释，为什么成年人记不住儿童时期的事！
说同时使用安全带和另一项什么措施（忘了）的司机出车祸的可能性小。但是使用该措施的司机比不使用该措施的司机更少出事，因此是该措施降低了accident。问此题的逻辑错误。我选的好像是说什么仅仅说该措施和车祸率同时发生不足以说明两者的因果关系。（因为我觉得题目后来就再也没有考虑过安全带的作用）
同样是超速的情况下，车内装有雷达装置比没装的行驶距离长，事故率低。然后得出结论雷达可以降低事故率。（感觉和jj那道雷达不一样）问flaw在哪里：
我选的是仅仅因为2种情况同时发生不代表有因果联系 逻辑题。加强。这题没太看懂。一种什么植物吧。。对一种细菌产生9个小时的什么反应，但是对一种什么R，只反应3个小时。因此是一种什么物质，能让R这种物质进入植物细胞内云云。。。答案我忘了。。。
逻辑题。两人辩论。A说有两种方法可以获得资金弥补某项支出不足。一是提高公共运输的车费fare，一种是提高所有人的某种税。B说对所有人征税不公平，因为有些人自己开车云云。问题是B的辩论基于什么假设？
答案我选的是：不应该向不使用公共运输服务的人征税。
逻辑题。填空。某公司去年的新产品雇佣外部公司进行包装。否则（？）顾客对新产品一直不停地抱怨。今年出几种新产品，但是manager说，用外部公司包装也没用，因为____ 答案我选的是“因为顾客总会对新产品抱怨，而与质量无关” [错的，因为答案要和包装有关系] 逻辑。一种新政策，公司倒垃圾会被定额罚款。反对者认为，这样不好，因为公司会据此分析出在什么样的情况下倒多少垃圾，这样就能够使得罚款比清理垃圾便宜。答案是问假设。我忘了，好像选的是两种数额的比较什么的。。。大家再看看其他人的机经吧。[垃圾，罚款，清理。估计是假设罚款可以被弄到低于清理费用]
一道逻辑，讲一种新的ice cream比regular ice cream含的fat更少，但是它们所含calory是一样的。但是许多吃新ice cream的顾客好像是更少增肥（讲法不记得了）。问怎么解释这个现象。
某公司推出low-fat ice-cream，但是含的卡路里跟正常的冰激凌一样。但是吃low-fat ice-cream的人还是会比吃正常ice-cream的人从冰激凌摄入的卡路里少，因为————
一个选项是说low-fat ice-cream里含有某物质可以减少人对脂肪的吸收。还有一个选项说其他品牌的冰激淋怎样怎样。现在想想也有可能对……哎呀，我也不知道啦，反正我的逻辑一向很烂……我的逻辑是弱项……所以不误导大家了。[可能是有新元素或者fat能都减少calory的吸收] calory 又一道逻辑，填空题。说什么什么政策只为少数人牟利，只在少数时候考虑到民众。而国会是为了大多数人服务云云。从这点可以看出—— 答案我选的是这个政策大多数和国会的imcompatible 我选的是政府的为大多人利益的measures是和国会一致的，因为文中后来提到了政府，好像只有这个可以把她们联系起来
38. GWD21-Q38: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages. Last year, however, one candidate produced a half-hour-long advertisement. During the half hour the advertisement was aired, a substantial portion of the viewing public tuned into the advertisement. Clearly, then, many more people are interested in watching lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? A. The candidate’s ratings improved significantly as a result of the half-hour-long political advertisement. B. Political advertisements have become increasingly influential in determining voters’ decisions at the polls. C. Many people would appreciate the opportunity to become better acquainted with political candidates’ views on current political issues. D. Most people who are interested in political issues watch television regularly. E. Most of the viewers who tuned in to the candidate’s half-hour-long advertisement last year did not change channels after the first few minutes. 说是一个地方(African)的人通过land bridge 去Europe & Asian 在130million years ago to | 
