返回列表 发帖

GWD3-17问题看不懂啊!

Q17:

Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

A. Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.

B. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.

C. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.

D. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.

E. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.

请问题目的问法"Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?"应该怎样理解?

以下选项如果正确,能够作为反驳criticism观点的最好的论据?(削弱题型)

以下选项如果正确,能够作为criticism反驳Brochure的最好论据?(加强题型)

实在胡涂,题目不明白肯定不会做的,哪位给指点一下?答案为什么是B?
收藏 分享

题目要寻找一个反驳Criticism选项

我认为是B, B在说water-conserving landscape 好的理由

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看