返回列表 发帖

GWDTN-10中的一题逻辑难以理解

GWD-24-Q 22:

Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-rays because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When a number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

     A.      Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly.

B.       Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.

C.      X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

D.      The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.

E.       Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

答案C,原题逻辑是因为很多人做了X-ray发现没有问题,所以follow-up x-rays 是浪费钱。C的意思就是很多医院都在review x-rays,难道这就能对原题形成强化吗?难以理解,请高人点拨

收藏 分享

我的理解是,既然已经在hospital x-ray过了,那就不必要再在orthopedists 那儿

再看了

TOP

C题可以这么理解:同一个骨折要在多家医院照X光,这是不必要的。

TOP

同意楼上的分析

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看