返回列表 发帖

[求助]TTGWD3-02

Q2:

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

  1. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
  2. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
  3. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
  4. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
  5. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

答案:E,看了有点糊涂,麻烦哪位nn好心给解释一下,谢谢!!

收藏 分享

这个题目是要削弱结论,也就是说取消关税不会阻碍政府在未来5年内降低城市失业率,

E是从反面来说的,政府现在限制腰果出口,农民利润减少,所以他们就不愿意再种植,转

而去城市就业,就会提高城市失业率.

TOP

明白了,谢谢!!

但是想明白C,哪里有问题?谢谢

TOP

c和要削弱的结论没有关系啊

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看