返回列表 发帖

prep test2-essay 2有句话不明白

More selective than most chemical pesticides in that they ordinarily destroy only unwanted species, biocontrol agents (such as insects, fungi, and viruses) eat, infect, or parasitize targeted plant or animal pests.  However, biocontrol agents can negatively affect nontarget species by, for example, competing with them for resources:  a biocontrol agent might reduce the benefits conferred by a desirable animal species by consuming a plant on which the animal prefers to lay its eggs. Another example of indirect negative consequences occurred in England when a virus introduced to control rabbits reduced the amount of open ground (because large rabbit populations reduce the ground cover), in turn reducing underground ant nests and triggering the extinction of a blue butterfly that had depended on the nests to shelter its offspring.The paucity of known extinctions or disruptions resulting from indirect interactions may reflect not the infrequency of such mishaps but rather the failure to look for or to detect them:  most organisms likely to be adversely affected by indirect interactions are of little or no known commercial value and the events linking a biocontrol agent with an adverse effect are often unclear.  Moreover, determining the potential risks of biocontrol agents before they are used is difficult, especially when a nonnative agent is introduced, because, unlike a chemical pesticide, a biocontrol agent may adapt in unpredictable ways so that it can feed on or otherwise harm new hosts.

黄色部分:virus是杀死兔子的,virus减少了Open ground,(因为兔子减少了ground cover)

请问这里的open ground和ground cover是什么意思啊,如果是一个意思,那不是矛盾了吗?

收藏 分享

我觉得是这样, 正是因为大量的兔子需要消耗大量的ground, 那我引入一个virus先把ground都给你搞掉了, 兔子不就没的消耗了, 不就该死菜菜了吗?

这里reduce可以理解为consume, 个人意见哈.

还有给楼主提个建议, 我觉得你太关注细节了, 这篇文章我扫这句话时看到to control rabbits时就没有再仔细看了, 直接就是到in turn reducing了, 事实证明这里对解题也没啥帮助.

TOP

那为什么要用一个BECAUSE呢?because large rabbit populations reduce the ground cover

我觉得because是说明原因的,因为兔子要减少ground cover,而这个东东正是政府要保护的,你说“我引入一个virus先把ground都给你搞掉了”意思是说这两个是一个东东落?reduce我觉得不是消耗的意思,注意有large这个词,所以觉得这个ground cover应该是要保护的,而不是通过消灭这个cover来达到灭兔子的目的-_-||

我还是挺关注细节的,怕万一哪点不清楚就考到了呢?而且对文章整体理解有好处,只是举例的话我会略过的

TOP

先翻译一下这篇文章前两句话:
生物控制剂(如昆虫,真菌和病毒)能蚕食、感染或寄生于特定有害植物或动物。然而,生物控制剂也会对非目标物种产生不好的影响,例如,抢占其资源:生物控制剂可能会因为毁灭了某种植物而使一种有益动物获得的好处减少,因为该动物喜欢在这种植物上产卵。
上面两句话中观点句是应该重点,说白了就是说“biocontrol agent有问题”。后面的一个例子只是为了读者更好的理解这个观点,读不懂完全可以放弃。接下来又来一个例子,其实不读也罢。
其意思基本与上个例子相同:
另一个(生物控制剂带来的)非直接负性影响的例子发生在英国,人们用一种病毒来减少野兔的数量,导致了空地的减少(因为野兔能吃掉覆盖在地面的植物),于是蚂蚁窝的数量减少了(估计是植物的根会使得蚂蚁不好造窝),结果一种依靠蚂蚁窝来保护其后代的篮蝴蝶遭受了灭顶之灾。
举这个例子,无非是要说明观点,顺便告诉你这种坏影响有时是如此的复杂,它会拐弯抹角的产生坏影响。个人认为如果考到该细节可以再回来读,并在观点的指导下来读。

TOP

也许你的理解是对的, 今天偏头疼, 我不想了!

总之这里不影响解题, 呵呵

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看