返回列表 发帖

蓝皮书上289题,请各位NN指点

Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-let seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.

Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?

A.        Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that id not send employees to the seminars.

B.        Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to dales seminars since 1987 experienced a great drop in sales than they had prior to 1987.

C.        The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.

D.       The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.

E.        Sine 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent.

为什么选 A 问题是对critics of sales seminars的削弱,A不是加强了吗?is the most effective challenge应该说seminar 好才对啊?请各位大虾解释一二。

收藏 分享

原文中说参加seminar,导致了公司sales low。我们现在可以想,在没有参加seminar的公司的sale和参加seminar的公司根本不在一个等级,比如一个是IBM,一个是清华同方。那么在seminar之后,IBM销售量还是大于清华同方。不就否认了是因为seminar的原因使得参加seminar的公司销售量不高啊!


我们如果在原题加一个assumption,表明在seminar之前,所有公司的销售量都一样,但是在seminar之后,参加seminar的公司销售量低了,那么才能说明是semina导致的销售量降低。


OG有好多篇文章都说有两个group参加同一个活动,然后活动之后一个group在某一方面变得更好或更差,结论是这个活动影响了group的这个方面,然后让你削弱。削弱的最直接手段就是在参加词活动之前,这两个group就在那个方面就不处于同一个水平线上。

TOP

明白了,谢了谢了~~~~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看