返回列表 发帖

一道PP3,怎么也读不明白

Technological improverments and reduced equipment costs made

converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cose-efficient in

the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar

power (that is , the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order

for new solar power plants to be more ecnomical than new oil-fired

power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

 

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased

cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of eco-

nomic viability?

A  The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.

B   The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occured

    despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.

C  Technolofical changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired

 power plants.

答案C,

请问,括号里面那句,怎么翻译?谢谢了

收藏 分享

括号里面的东西是蒙人的。题意是虽然技术进步了,但是其和火力发电的比较,还是不如火力发电。所以答案基本要么是 火力发电viabilty远远领先,太阳发电的进步没用; 要么是火力发电也进步了。 好像是一个比例, A/B =k  , A增加了,但是k依旧没达到一个值,其原因要么B太大,要么是B也增加了

TOP

哦,终于搞明白了,thanks!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看