og里being唯一对的那道题的一点小疑问--when到底修饰谁

lovedoublej

100. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of

action, especially if it has worked well in the past,

makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or

misinterpret them when they do appear.

(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a

course of action, especially one that worked well

in the past, makes missing signs of incipient

trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they

do appear.


(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action,

especially one that has worked well in the past,

is likely to make an executive miss signs of

incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they

do appear.
B选项when they do appear更像是做状语，修饰整个句子，而E选项when they do appear才修饰了mininterpret，我困惑的是怎样判断到底是作状语修饰整个句子，还是修饰misinterpret呢，有什么根据吗？语法基础不好，求大家指点，最好能讲的详细些，拜托拜托

modernre

五个选项中，只有B把likely放在了when的前面，是【make sth】【likely when】还是【make sth likely】【when】有歧义啊。

lovedoublej

你说的方法确实不错的，值得仔细研究，但是我真的很想知道为什么B想中的when放错了位置，而E项中的when是正确的，原谅我钻牛角尖啊，谢啦

modernre

OG没说B选项的when they do appear更像是状语吧。。。明明是说when they do appear的位置misplaced了。这一题的解题关键，或者说每一个GMAT语法题的解题关键就是尽可能少的出现歧义，带着这样的精神，你就会主动避开多出现的代词，就会主动希望修饰词和被修饰对象距离要靠近。
这一题的B选项中，当especially后面的one出现的时候，前一句已经出现了两个名词，executive和course of action。one就出现了指代歧义；再来，当misinterpreting后面的ones出现的时候，这个ones从语法上应该优先指代missing signs，可实际逻辑上，ones是指代signs而非missing signs，这样一来when they do appear的they可能指代signs，也可能指代missing signs，虽然后者根本不应该出现。另一个原因就是OG说的，B选项的逻辑关系错误。是executive的strategy而不是他自己容易造成miss或者misinterpret。
再来看E选项...我以上说的歧义全部被消除，多完美的答案啊。。。