大全-C-2

sunniers

TEST-C    NO.2

We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.



Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

(A) The percentage of voters registered as independents is higher today than ever before.

B) In a recent presidential campaign, for the first time ever, an independent candidate was invited to appear in a televised debate with the major-party candidates.

(C) Every current member of the U.S. Senate was elected as the candidate of one of the two major parties.

(D) In a recent opinion poll, most voters stated that a candidate’s party affiliation was an insignificant factor in judging his or her fitness for office

(E) In the last four years, the outcome of several statewide elections has been determined by the strength of the third-party vote.

一点头绪都没有! 答案为C(有劳啦！)

bettyofariN

But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party
candidate has won any important election in recent years
这句话想表达个什么意思呢？

sunniers

谢谢LZ！！

fangzep

这题很无聊。原文结论是说这两个主要政党立即要消失的报道为时过早。原文有两个证据：还没有独立或第三党候选人；最近的普选两个党投了很多钱（可以给媒体，而媒体可以决定选举结果）。C选项提出另一个证据：现在参议院的成员都是两个政党的人。其他都易排除