返回列表 发帖

一道prep难题,大家看看,一起分析下

165. 

Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as China's giant pandas.

 

(A) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as 

(B) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, researchers have determined, making them many times more rare than

(C) There are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined, which makes the leopards many times more rare compared to

(D) Researchers have determined that, because of being poached and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, thus making them many more times as rare as

(E) Researchers have determined that, because of poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times more rare than

a small question on the Official answer E

Why dont use "being poached" as D does?

It is obvious that the leopard is poached.

Many thanks


不知道如何下手,due to 、because of这两种不好的结构都有;their修饰不清的情况也都有,不知道怎么判断了???

收藏 分享

 poaching在这里是名词,和后面的cultivation并列。
A的话肯定是不对的,due to paching and cultivation, leopards减少了,而不是due to poaching and

cultivation,researchers 才决定leopards少了,因此A这样的结构翻译下来的意思是因为捕猎和耕种,研究者发现

blablabla。。。。

TOP

(B) (D) "making them..." 修飾對象不清。
一般出現Ving 修飾對象通常是作為前置N.之 modifier 或是前面整句話的動作(如

OG11 Q43, OG11 Q71),但此處顯然無法如此解釋。排除。
(D) 之比較表達(many more times...)有誤

(C) which 應指代名詞(而緊鄰於前者並非N.,已經是錯誤選項的徵兆了),則根據

就近指代原則,其修飾對象為 researchers,邏輯不通。何況(C)的比較表達有誤

(more ... compared to)

如此則剩下選項(A)(E),考慮其表達倍數方式均可,此兩者主要差別在引導"原因"之

介詞片語之位置不同。由句意邏輯判斷,此原因是修飾"there are fewer than ..."

而不是修飾 "researchers have determined taat...",故排除(A)而選(E)。

TOP

C 不仅run-on,而且意思混乱,应该第一个被干掉的阿;because of也有正确的

时候,不是优先度很高的判断标准。个人意见,继续讨论

TOP

C也不对。WHICH 不能指代前面的全部

我是菜鸟,我说说,D,E看见BECAUSE OF直接就否了

TOP

个人觉得D的问题有很多:

1。because of后面只能接名词性结构,being poached 不能看成是名词结构吧;而且

poached用被动意义上感觉也不妥(这里强调的是poach这个动作本身带来的结果,而

不是强调被poached这个行为);

2。thus是adv,不能代替conj连接句子;

3。making没有使动者,谁在make?

TOP

首先正面回答你的问题为什么不用 being proached:
1, poaching 和 increased cultivation 都是名词结构,指发生在their habitats上的事情。being proached 不一致
2,还有一个原因就是idiomatical
还有一个原因选E
就是and that these leopards are 中的that和前面的句式对应

TOP

d

这题没人答么??我觉得不知道从哪里下手做啊

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看