请教大全-8-12

michizer

12. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

答案：A，这题我有点糊涂了，不明白怎么做。能否讲讲。谢谢。

linlin3151

恶心题

D说的是the same way

the way of the responce is irrelevant to the argument at all.

oumengling

可是我觉得按hexin的解释,应该D更符合答案才对啊? 为啥每次回答都是NO(all

respond the same way), 那不就是D答案所说的吗? confusing....

michizer

我明白了。谢谢。

seinfeld0923

theorists的解释说the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into

separate parts，那么被催眠的人的所有器官都成为孤立的，没有任何内在的联系。

聋的部份(耳朵)，回答的部份(嘴)。。。如果是这样，嘴的回答就应该是随机的，则

应有时回答“Yes”。而实验证明嘴每次都回答的是“No.” ，这说明在the part

that is deaf 和the part that replies间必然有一种内在的联系。(A)对theorists

的解释提出了很好的质疑，从而起到削弱的作用。
迷惑选项(D)，但(D) 中hypnotized subjects没有(A) 中the part that replies更

切题。(A) 最佳。