听力加试-lecture two (相当全!有英文介绍,有考点) LECTURE TWO 主题:浪漫主义诗歌 内容简介:主要介绍18-19 世纪英国浪漫主义(Romanticism)诗歌的代表人Wordsworth的诗。他是浪漫主义的鼻祖,但浪漫主义这个称谓是后人加上的,不是他们本身这样称呼自己的(有题目出现)。Romanticism不是我们平时理解的romance,和男女之间的爱情无关。Romanticism针对的是common people而不是少数educated people,用的是simple language,描述的是日常生活中常见的事物,孩子,人类情感,以及自然和人类之间的互动。教授以自己为例,说自己在散步时感受到了这种互动(有题目出现)与romanticism针锋相对的一种风格是neoclassicism新古典主义,也是那位romanticism的鼻祖很反对的。neoclassicism使用太多的elaboration,如sky不叫sky,而叫blue什么的;bird不叫bird,而叫feathered person。教授把该诗人的作品分为三个阶段。早期的浪漫主义作品,主要描述植物的(花与草)诗歌。 中期时是对一些社会现象的评论。后期时对早期的作品进行修改。目前文学界还是认为它早期的作品是最好的。教授还说,他的诗越写到后来越糟糕,反而早期的比较好,本文重点讲了他第一阶段的诗。
本篇文章要点: 本篇文章中涉及到了一道举例题,比如文章中教授会用自己的一个经历举例子,然后问教授为什么说这个例子,学生在听文章的时候应该注意到比如for example等词句,文中一旦出现例子,一定会有考题出现。另外,文章涉及到了一个事物的分类,像这种分类的情况,一定也会涉及到考题,比如填表体等等。所以考生在听得过程中,应该记住是怎么分类的,并且记住每一类的具体特征即可。
本文涉及到的背景知识介绍:
Wordsworth, as we have said, is the chief representative of some of the most important principles in the Romantic Movement, but he is far more a member of any movement, through his supreme poetic expression of some of the greatest spiritual ideals he belongs among the five or six greatest English poets. First, he is the profoundest interpreter of nature in all poetry. His feeling for nature has two aspects. He is keenly sensitive, and in a more delicately discriminating way than any of his predecessors, to all the external beauty and glory of nature, especially inanimate nature of mountains, woods and fields, streams and flowers, in all their infinitely varied aspects. A wonderful joyous and intimate sympathy with them is one of his controlling impulses。
In the second place, Wordsworth is the most consistent of all the great English poets of democracy, though here as elsewhere his interest is mainly not in the external but in the spiritual aspect of things。
The obstinacy and these poems are only the most conspicuous result of Wordsworth’s chief temperamental defect, which was an almost total lack of the sense of humor. Regarding himself as the prophet of a supremely important new gospel, he never admitted the possibility of error in his own point of view and was never able to stand aside from his poetry and criticize it dispassionately. |