GWD6-Q20: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.
Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts. B.Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government. C.The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder. D.Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts. E.Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced. 老师这题B应该是答案呀？为啥选D哪？不是说工厂提供给工人这些已经免税的账户，这样政府就不能从引进这种特殊账户而获得好处！这不就是说明了会有很多人不去存特殊账户，这样也就没有特殊账户的增加，计划也就不成立呀？
GMAT培训讲师robert详细解答回复可见：
题型：削弱
本文的逻辑结构是这样的：本帖隐藏的内容需要回复才可以浏览 D是正确答案
希望我的解答对你有帮助！
Robert | 
