42. Unlike using spices for cooking, in medicinal usage they are taken in large quantities in order to treat particular maladies. A) Unlike using spices for cooking, in medicinal usage they are taken B) unlike spices that are used in cooking, in using spices for medicine, they are taken C) Unlike cooking with spices, taking spices for medicinal use is done D) In cooking, small quantities of spices are used, whereas in medicinal usage spices are taken E) In cooking, the usage of spices is in small quantities, whereas in medicinal usage they are taken A: unlike和后面主语不对等
B: unlike比较对象不对等
C: cooking和taking spices逻辑意义上不对等
D: correct E: they指代不明，可以指quantities or spices 这里，B为何比较对象不平行？这里应该是spices和they互为比较对象是吗？我理解关键这里这个they指代什么？ 这里出现了A for B的结构。那么they是不是应该优先指代 using spices ？还是指代 “spices” 或者“medicine"? 我排除B的时候是觉得指代不明排除掉的。 A: unlike和后面主语不对等
B: unlike比较对象不对等
C: cooking和taking spices逻辑意义上不对等
D: correct E: they指代不明，可以指quantities or spices 这里，B为何比较对象不平行？这里应该是spices和they互为比较对象是吗？我理解关键这里这个they指代什么？ 这里出现了A for B的结构。那么they是不是应该优先指代 using spices ？还是指代 “spices” 或者“medicine"? 我排除B的时候是觉得指代不明排除掉的。 A: unlike和后面主语不对等
B: unlike比较对象不对等
C: cooking和taking spices逻辑意义上不对等
D: correct E: they指代不明，可以指quantities or spices 这里，B为何比较对象不平行？这里应该是spices和they互为比较对象是吗？我理解关键这里这个they指代什么？ 这里出现了A for B的结构。那么they是不是应该优先指代 using spices ？还是指代 “spices” 或者“medicine"? 我排除B的时候是觉得指代不明排除掉的。 | 
