- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 4389
- 经验
- 4389 点
- 威望
- 1 点
- 金钱
- 7381 ¥
- 魅力
- 3879
|
1-OG补充29Choices A and B are unclear and imprecise: on the basis of avoidance… and on the grounds of avoiding … do not present reasons that support the statement in the main clause, and alone seems illogically to modify duplicated facilities. Also, duplicated facilities in A, B, and C identifies the problem with the facilities that have been duplicated, not with the act of duplicating facilities; for example, C apparently advises people to avoid facilities that have been duplicated. In D, while establishes no logical relation between the main clause and the rest of the sentence. E is best: if only because introduces a reason for the preceding statement, and the remainder of the answer choice is logically worded. The question is difficult.2-OG补充33Choice A, C, and E are faulty because the pronoun they has no logical noun to which it can refer; also could not be foreseen in A seems to describe specific weather conditions in the past, not ones that are still unforeseeable and so continue to affect spraying. B corrects both problems. C contains the unattached they and inflates cause to are the cause of; moreover, by changing cause from a verb to a noun, C states that all three factors acting together constitute the one and only cause of excessive deposits. The initial phrase of D is less compact and idiomatic than that of B. This question is difficult.3-OG补充42The best answer will exhibit parallelism. Choice B correctly forms a parallel structure: was advised…, told…, and interrogated… Because all three verbs are governed by the was in line 1, the was after and in choice A is not merely unnecessary but actually wrong because it disrupts the parallel. Choice C is wordy and ungrammatical: the syntax forces was advised rather than was to govern all three elements, a construction that becomes impossible with was advised…interrogated. A similar misconstruction in D produces the misstatement that the suspect was advised that he… was interrogated. E forms a list of non parallel elements; placing and after silent and dropping the commas would make E grammatical but no less wordy. This question is very difficult.4-A中and前后结构不平行,错。5-OG119Choice B, the best answer, uses clear and concise phrasing to state that it is the effects of drug and alcohol abuse that already cost business the sum mentioned. In A, to business is awkwardly and confusingly inserted between cost and the prepositional phrase that modifies it, and are already a cost to business is wordy and awkward compared to cost business. In C, already with business costs of... is awkward and unclear, failing to specify that those prior effects generate the cost. Choices D and E produce faulty constructions with the phrase significant in compounding, which cannot grammatically modify the verb form is growing |
|