返回列表 发帖

GWD 29-16

Q16:

Political Advertisement:

 

 

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but each year since Delmont took office the average pay for the new jobs created has been higher than that year’s average pay for jobs citywide.  So it stands to reason that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?

 

 

  1. The unemployment rate in the city is higher today than it was when Mayor Delmont took office.
  2. The average pay for jobs in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
  3. Each year during Mayor Delmont’s tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.
  4. Most of the jobs eliminated during Mayor Delmont’s tenure were in declining industries.
  5. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently lower than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

答案是D,为什么去除的工作大部分在夕阳工业就能weaken这个argument?

收藏 分享

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看