Board logo

标题: SC 两问 [打印本页]

作者: hardfish    时间: 2003-1-7 06:21     标题: SC 两问

1。 According to some analysts, whatever (its merits, the proposal to tax) way all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.
A.
B. its merits may be, the proposal of taxing

Key is A. Why can omit be 动词  in "whatever its merits"?

2. Although ( all the proceddings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were not carried live,) Soviet audiences have seen a great deal of coverage.
A.
B. all the Communist party conferences's Moscow proceedings were not carried live.
C. all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have not been carried alive.
D. not all the Communist party conference Moscow proceedings have been carried alive
E. not all the proceedings of the Communist party conference held in Moscow were carried live.

Which one is the best?
作者: Louisa_xy    时间: 2003-1-7 12:32

1.whatever is a adj. in this sentence,and it means 无论...,
"whatever its merits" and "whatever its merits may be" express the same meaning, but the latter is redundant.
Also, "to tax away..." modify "the proposal" and indicate the purpose of the the proposal but not the content of the proposal.
作者: arrymin    时间: 2003-1-7 12:45

NO 2 is 新东方补充题No 151 ,答案是E,具体解释在M012的讨论区里有.主要是not all表示部分否定,all not则不同.
另外一题也是新东方补充题,但是我找不到题号了,如果hardfish知道的话,可以直接去m012语法部分查一下,有不错的解释.
作者: Louisa_xy    时间: 2003-1-7 12:46

2.I feel A is the best.
in B,C and D, the modificatory relation is confusing, and in D and E, "not" is placed before all,meaning some were carried alive but others were not,thus the original meaning is distorted.
作者: 卧室春竹    时间: 2003-1-7 19:12

第二个题 应该是e吧!

虽然not all proceedings...... were carried alive, 但是苏联老大哥们已经.....

这样符合逻辑吧?

prooceedings 是指会议记录吧?!
作者: Louisa_xy    时间: 2003-1-7 21:46

是E,我糊涂了




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2