1. That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology（D）

(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said

C为什么不可以？

IT 在这里指代不清。

而且这里强调的是educators没有错误，而不是强调这个错误。

个人看法，欢迎指正.

C的意思有问题：它说的是仅仅那些没有预料到计算机技术的影响的那一部分edecator,偏离了本题目中讨论的全体educator，这就是为什么og说distorts meaning。但我不觉得有语法问题，og它awkward我不明白怎么回事。

另外我不明白的是主句之后居然用了个冒号，后面又是一个完整而独立的句子，两者之间没有任何联结词，这两句之间是什么关系啊？是不是改称分号更好？