Board logo

标题: 2 sc 请问 [打印本页]

作者: redhat    时间: 2002-11-6 19:40     标题: 2 sc 请问

Degler does more than merely summarizing existing research; he constructs a coherent picutre of two centuries of studies dealing with the changing roles of women.
答案是:
(E) Degler does more than merely summarize
为何:
(A)        Degler does more than merely summarizing
不行?刘振民着的解释为:比较前后的summarize不对称
还是不了解!!do后不是放Ving吗?

In his eagerness to find a city worthy of Priam, the German archaeologist Schliemann cut through Troy and uncovered a civilization a thousand years older as was the city Homer’s heroes knew.
ANS :
(B)        more ancient than the city known to Homer’s heroes
我选的为
(c) older than was the city known to Homer’s heroes
解释的是在c中补出was, 出现句子的结构是不需要的, why?


[em06][em06][em06][em06]
作者: princess    时间: 2002-11-6 22:04

1.这道题我也胡涂了
感觉上more应该是名词,如果比较双方要对称的话,应该用动名词
偶乱说的:P,哪位知道的指点一下啦

2.我觉得这儿不是说出现句子结构不对,省略was不会影响句子意思的表达,又比较简洁
另外more ancient的表达要比older好,我记得GMAT中有一题开头是The ancient n. ....
作者: cook    时间: 2002-11-6 22:12

1. "does" here stands for emphasize ,"YU QI - modal"
2. Comparing : civilization , a non, no sentence need.
作者: princess    时间: 2002-11-6 22:16

cook:你是说does在这儿只是表强调语气?不理解
作者: cook    时间: 2002-11-6 22:19

Yes, you got it.
for example: I do know it is my fault.
作者: princess    时间: 2002-11-6 22:25

sorry,我不能同意呃

do表强调语气的话都是紧跟在谓语动词的前面,就像你觉得例子
我觉得这句话中的do还是个实义动词
作者: cook    时间: 2002-11-6 22:30

More for you reference: I do want to be sure! Do be still!
作者: princess    时间: 2002-11-6 22:34

可是可是,你举的例子中do都是和实义动词(want,be)相连的啊

I do believe that you are wrong. hehe
作者: redhat    时间: 2002-11-6 22:39

译为:不尽尽是概括了现存的研究成果,还….(类似表达如:A historical novel may do more than mirror history; it may even influence future events.在toefl出现过)而do more than…要记为一习惯的表达方式吗?? OR USED AS AN EMPHASIS?
SORRY I REALLY DON'T GET IT. : (
作者: princess    时间: 2002-11-6 22:43

既然这样的话,我觉得可能就是一个对称的问题,mirror和do相对应
把它记为习惯表达法吧
作者: tongxun    时间: 2002-11-6 22:54

do 与summarize 平行。
作者: jjjjjj    时间: 2002-11-6 23:07

Exactly. Agree tongxun.如果把more than summary 去掉,或把does more than 去掉,看的就清楚些了.
作者: redhat    时间: 2002-11-7 21:27

I see...thanks a lot!




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2