Board logo

标题: 请教OG13 SC50的B,D选项 [打印本页]

作者: waytousff    时间: 2013-5-22 06:58     标题: 请教OG13 SC50的B,D选项

原题如下
50. According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence
that the economy will avoid the recession that many
had feared earlier in the year and instead come
in for a “soft landing,” followed by a gradual increase in business activity.





(A) that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead co




(B) in the economy to avoid the recession, what many feared earlier in the year, rather to come

(C) in the economy’s ability to avoid the recession, something earlier in the year many had feared, and instead to come



(D) in the economy to avoid the recession many were fearing earlier in the year, and rather to come

(E) that the economy will avoid the recession that was feared earlier this year by many, with it instead coming


根据OG13的解释:
(B) in the economy to avoid the recession, what many feared earlier in the year, rather to come
....rather to come does not complete the second part of the sentence idiomatically.
我不大理解这个意思,如果不管这个结构不好于what使用不正确这些问题的话,我看不出rather to come有什么问题。(与前面的to avoid不是平行了么)




(D) in the economy to avoid the recession many were fearing earlier in the year, and rather to come
....were fearing is the wrong tense.
这个难道是指过去进行时用得不对么?

PS:顺路问一个关于And的用法,如果And前面加了comma,除了后面是加名词之外,就一定只能加clause(有完整Subject+Verb)了么?

等待大家的答案!SC小弱正在痛苦与OG看齐中……




作者: yujunchening    时间: 2013-5-22 17:35

rather不能接to do,B和D都是错在这里
作者: waytousff    时间: 2013-5-23 06:40

rather后面是加do么?
作者: nancy5130    时间: 2013-5-25 16:03

这里rather 不合句意。
作者: sophieMOON    时间: 2013-5-27 18:53

og解释说bcd中rather to come 和instead to come都不对。rather 和instead 后面都不可以加不定式么?
作者: aaroncheng    时间: 2013-5-29 18:49

instead后面可以加to么?(Ron):

it's perfectly possible to have instead in front of an infinitive. for instance...

we decided not to eat at the restaurant, and instead to cook our own food at home.

technically, “instead…” modifies the verb “decided” (as does the other parallel structure), so there is no contradiction. but the point is that it's totally possible to have instead in front of to + verb.




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2