Board logo

标题: OG13TH 100 求助 [打印本页]

作者: cherryser    时间: 2013-3-18 07:22     标题: OG13TH 100 求助

100. Debater: The average amount of overtime per month worked by an employee in the manufacturing division of the Haglut Corporation is 14 hours. Most employees of the Haglut Corporation work in the manufacturing division. Furthermore, the average amount of overtime per month worked by any employee in the company generally does not fluctuate much from month to month. Therefore, each month, most employees of the Haglut Corporation almost certainly work at least some overtime.



The debater’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which of these grounds?







(A) It takes for granted that the manufacturing division is a typical division of the corporation with regard to the average amount of overtime its employees work each month.





(B) It takes for granted that if a certain average amount of overtime is worked each month by each employee of the Haglut Corporation, then approximately the same amount of overtime must be worked each month by each employee of the manufacturing division.







(C) It confuses a claim from which the argument’s conclusion about the Haglut Corporation would necessarily follow with a claim that would follow from the argument’s conclusion only with a high degree of probability.





(D) It overlooks the possibility that even if, on average, a certain amount of overtime is worked by the members of some group, many members of that group may work no overtime at all.





(E) It overlooks the possibility that even if most employees of the corporation work some overtime each month, any one corporate employee may, in some months, work no overtime.


这个题如何解?! C选项表示看不懂·········!!!!



作者: howie0420    时间: 2013-3-18 20:09

个人认为是D,The average amount of overtime 不等于每一个人都 overtime
也可能是一小部分人的 overtime 平摊到了每个人头上。
作者: cherryser    时间: 2013-3-19 06:47

能解释下 C 是什么东西么?
作者: chaomat1988    时间: 2013-3-20 06:40

(C) It confuses a claim from which the argument’s conclusion about the Haglut Corporation would necessarily follow with a claim that would follow from the argument’s conclusion only with a high degree of probability.


混淆了 充分条件,即必然性(a claim from which the argument’s conclusion about the Haglut Corporation would necessarily follow)和 极大的可能性
作者: gui5910667    时间: 2013-3-21 06:52

necessarily副词=介词短语with a  necessity伴随着一个必然性,with

a high degree of probability伴随着极大的可能性

It confuses a claim 。。。with a claim 。。。
把一个观点的必然性,当成了混淆成了可能性




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2