Board logo

标题: 一道prep的题目~~临近考试了却发现自己做逻辑的思路好像有点问题了 [打印本页]

作者: kkfrancais    时间: 2013-1-27 21:12     标题: 一道prep的题目~~临近考试了却发现自己做逻辑的思路好像有点问题了

Kitchen magazine plans to license the use of its name by a line of cookware.  For a magazine, licensing the use of its name for products involves some danger, since if the products disappoint consumers, the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulation and advertising.  However, experts have evaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertised in Kitchen.  Therefore, Kitchen can collect its licensing fee without endangering its other revenues.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
A. No other line of cookware is superior to that which will carry the Kitchen name.
B. Kitchen will not license the use of its name for any products other than the line of cookware.
C. Makers of cookware will not find Kitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name is associated with a competing product.
D. Consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine will be attracted to the cookware by the Kitchen name.
E. Kitchen is one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines.



正确答案是C
文中的结论是这本杂志可以收取license fee并且不会损害到它的收入。
原因是专家发现kitchen要命名的cookware比其他在kitchen上做广告的质量要好,所以不会使消费者失望而影响到它的收入。
我想专家只是和在kitchen上做过广告的cookware比较,没有和别的产品比较啊,所以选了A。
能不能帮我解释下是为什么呀?还有我的想法哪里错了?
作者: liuqiangde    时间: 2013-1-28 06:58

这道题题目中没有明显逻辑链断层,因此采用对选项取非削弱的方法判断

答案。

取非后
C. Makers of cookware will find Kitchen a less attractive

advertising vehicle because the magazine's name is associated with

a competing product. 人家都懒得去你那做广告,这厂家还整天幻想后面的

事情,痴人做梦么

A. 重复前提,这个不是assume的,人家专家都说了,你还assme
作者: kkfrancais    时间: 2013-1-29 06:45

哦,谢谢啦~~
不过我还是有一点小小的疑惑,专家assume的是superior than other cookware advertised in Kitchen Magazine, 没有和其他的锅子比呀,算不算是逻辑漏洞呢??
作者: man855112    时间: 2013-1-30 06:56

这个是排除它因它果的题。结论说了magzine的其他收入不会受影响。这

个其他收入就包括了广告的的收入。

C选项说,厨具制造商不会因为杂志的名字与它们的竞争者有关就会对这个杂志失去兴趣。

这正好排除了他们不会再本杂志做广告的可能性,因此也就排除了广告收入

可能会降低的后果。
作者: Ferris1992    时间: 2013-2-3 06:54

讲的很好!
作者: gui5910667    时间: 2013-2-20 20:56

a选项 从质量的角度加强了cookware质量的可靠性,但是问题问的是other revenue, :包括:杂志社要保护信誉,也要其他广告商投广告

c选项排除了这个可能------其他广告商看到杂志给竞争对手冠名后不打广告


所以是最佳选项




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2