Board logo

标题: gwd1-1 [打印本页]

作者: falcons    时间: 2005-9-3 07:28     标题: gwd1-1


1。During her presidency of the short-lived Woman’s State Temperance Society (1852-1853), Elizabeth Cady Stanton, as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be made sufficient cause for divorce.


  1. as she was a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in her suggestion that drunkenness should be
  2. as she was a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by her suggestion of drunkenness being
  3. in being a staunch advocate for liberalized divorce laws, had scandalized many of her most ardent supporters with the suggestion of drunkenness being
  4. a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by suggesting that drunkenness be
  5. a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, she scandalized many of her most ardent supporters in suggesting that drunkenness should be

the answer is d, that is ok, no problem

这里想到一个问题,

a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws, scandalized many of her most ardent supporters by suggesting that drunkenness be

这里可不可以改成 as a staunch advocate呢,也就是说变成Elizabeth Cady Stanton as a staunch advocate of liberalized divorce laws 这样改可不可以呢,和答案中的形式有何区别呢?请指教


作者: jhiiool    时间: 2005-9-3 08:01

语法上是没有错的,都成立。

不过逻辑上有问题,两者的区别是限定性修饰和非限定性修饰,请参考OG141

关于两者在逻辑意义上的区别。


作者: falcons    时间: 2005-9-4 07:47

谢谢楼主!!!




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2