Board logo

标题: P1 逻辑23题 铝罐和玻璃瓶那道 求助 [打印本页]

作者: Charlotte0512    时间: 2012-4-12 07:28     标题: P1 逻辑23题 铝罐和玻璃瓶那道 求助

From 1978 to 1988, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weight of household garbage in the United States.The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and glass was responsible for most of this decline.However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in this period than glass recycling, it was found that the weight of glass bottles in household garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminum cans.








Which of the following, if true of the United States in the period 1978 to 1988, most helps to account for the finding?








(A) Glass bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.




(B) Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycled glass bottles had contained products other than beverages.




(C) Manufacturers replaced many glass bottles, but few aluminum cans, with plastic containers.




(D) The total weight of glass bottles purchased by households increased at a slightly faster rate than the total weight of aluminum cans.




(E) In many areas, glass bottles had to be sorted by color of the glass before being recycled, whereas aluminum cans required no sorting.

答案选C 虽然觉得其他都选项不对,但就是想不出C为什么对。
已经搜索过以前的解释,就是想不通。
今天脑子有点搭牢了。。。求指教。



作者: kenwk    时间: 2012-4-12 20:39

因为题目问的是为啥GLASS BOTTLE的GARBAGE总的重量比铝的BOTTLE的GARBAGE少得更多了,而铝的BOTTLE明明被回收了更多啊,这个PARADOX如何解释?C的解释说因为相对于铝的BOTTLE来说,厂家把更多GLASS BOTTLE换成塑料的了,所以等于说生产总量这里GLASS BOTTLE大大减少了,所以即便被回收的速度没有铝的BOTTLE快,但是变成GARBAGE的却减少更多了。所以C可以解释这个PARADOX
作者: Charlotte0512    时间: 2012-4-13 06:55

谢谢。。。我后来想通了,自己刚开始对题目的理解有点问题。。。
作者: kronorrt    时间: 2012-4-13 21:36

同问,想知道A为什么不对,是无关选项吗?




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2