Excavations of the
Roman city of Sepphoris
have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable
animal species:
a hare, a partridge, and
various Mediterranean fish.
Oddly, most
of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these
mosaics were created.
Since identical
motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of
Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part
of the Roman Empire.
Which of the
following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed
exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.
There is no single region to which all
the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native.
No motifs appear in the Sepphoris
mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city.
All of the animal figures in the
Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known
species.
There was not a common repertory of
mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.
这个题我觉得是D, 因为前面花了篇幅写Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. 而不是说什么技术怎么怎么样。有人讨论一下么作者: pangpangshin 时间: 2011-3-15 06:48
D项,是不是known species和主题无关
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/)