In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
A Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
ANS:C
晕………….
不晓得要找什么答案感觉很模糊……..
请各位大大们帮忙????作者: stucashS 时间: 2010-9-23 20:56
Which
of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated
misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local
ordinances statewide?
下面那种情形会使得这个petition误导那些【认为propsal会从地方推广到全国的】支持者。
那些【认为propsal会从地方推广到全国的】支持者认为：地方性的法律会推广到全国
如果按C所说，全国的法律会超越相对更加严格的地方法律的话，刚好会造成误导作者: seuhongkai 时间: 2010-9-24 08:24
