9
Astronauts who experience weightlessness frequently get motion sickness. The astronauts see their own motion relative to passing objects, but while the astronauts are weightless their inner ears indicate that their bodies are not moving. The astronauts’ experience is best explained by the hypothesis that conflicting information received by the brain about the body’s motion causes motion sickness.
Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the hypothesis above?
A. During rough voyages ship passengers in cabins providing a view of the water are less likely to get motion sickness than are passengers in cabins providing no view.
B. Many people who are experienced airplane passengers occasionally get motion sickness.
C. Some automobile passengers whose inner ears indicate that they are moving and who have a clear view of the objects they are passing get motion sickness.
D. People who have aisle seats in trains or airplanes are as likely to get motion sickness as are people who have window seats.
E. Some astronauts do not get motion sickness even after being in orbit for several days.
这题有点恶毒，我上次做错了，我没搞清当交通工具动时，内耳告诉我们是动还是不动
关键在于我们要先搞清楚，当人乘坐voyage ship, automobile, airplane时内耳提供我们怎样一种信息
从题干中，当飞船飞行是，失重使得内耳认为人在静止（weightless indicate that their bodies are not moving）
--> 不失重，正常情况下，当交通工具移动时，内耳告诉我们，我们是在动
所以只有A，（内耳说在动，看见也在动）比起（内耳说在动，看不见在动no view)比较不容易晕。支持题目。
以上是我的理解，我还是有点奇怪为什么题目不告诉我们内耳是如何判断动不动的
哎，又想了下，好像我说的不对
题干中的，失重使得内耳认为人在静止 无法推出 不失重正常情况下，当交通工具移动时，内耳告诉我们，我们是在动
按道理，题目不会需要我们用常识去判断内耳到底是如何传递信息的呀？
不解，等待NN来解惑
内耳告诉大脑没有运动，所以大脑觉的自己没有运动，其实是运动的，所以motion sickness
A：眼睛告诉车夫你在运动，所以大脑觉的自己正在运动，事实也是运动，所以没有motion sickness
个人认为是一个conflicting information 的理解。
题干中说的根据外界物体判断是动了，但是内耳判断没动，这两者之间是一个conflict
题目是要我们找一个与之相似的同样是一个conflict的答案
我明白了 就像上面说的 这个A只不过是有一个信息不一致的例子，和上面的宇航员没有太大关系。
无论那种情况，只要自己大脑想的和看到的不一致，就更容易的motion sickness。
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |