Board logo

标题: gwd-07-02 [打印本页]

作者: 百草花园    时间: 2009-8-29 11:32     标题: gwd-07-02

我自己也不知道哪个是对的,请大家教教我吧!

Q2:


Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?


A   The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

B   Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

C   The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

D   The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

E   The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

   Answer: D


作者: hlyndons    时间: 2009-8-29 19:56

G作家认为房子越老,质量越好

而实际是因果颠倒,因为房子质量好,所以保存的时间才长久,至今岿然不动。

the more the more 八成是正确答案


两元素削弱,这是典型的因果颠倒削弱方式


作者: 百草花园    时间: 2009-8-30 08:44

谢谢你
作者: jiangmingjia    时间: 2009-10-9 07:30

G的逻辑是:因为保存下来的1930年之前的hotel的木活质量一般都比1930年后建的hotel木活质量好,因此1930年前所有为hotel工作的木匠比1930年后的所有为HOTEL工作的木匠手艺更好、更敬业。而从D中可知,保存下来的1930年之前的hotel的木工质量都是质量最好的,未保存下来的木活已废弃。

 

D的观点其实是:因为30年前质量最好的(部分)木活比30年后所有木活的质量好,所以30年之前的所有木匠比30年后的所有木匠的手艺更好、更敬业。

 

可见,G作家选取的样本没有典型意义。D weaken了G的推论。






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2