国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: GWD5-Q1 [打印本页]

作者: Snazzy 时间: 2009-4-15 07:04 标题: GWD5-Q1

找过以前的帖子，但是好像没有讨论出结果，所以再贴出来问NN。

GWD5-Q1:

So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.

A. and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,

B. and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that

C. her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that

D. lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,

E. so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that

虽然容易通过排除选出E项，但是这里的结构是什么呢？为什么两个SO的分局之间不用连词and呢？？

作者: daizexia90 时间: 2009-4-15 19:46

是不是因为倒装，所以可以省略and呢？

so + adj + 主语 + 谓语， so + adj + 主语 + 谓语，that + ...

(第二分句的were因为重复而省略）

作者: asasasas1 时间: 2009-4-16 06:54

有點像倒裝的獨立主格(省了was)....可是沒見過倒裝的獨立主格, 有人說是固定用法...
等NN來發表~

作者: ruhudisbfks 时间: 2009-4-16 21:07

在网上搜到了new york times上的原句。

So dogged were her investigations of the garment industry, and so

persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that she was first

recruited by Gov.

这么理解的话，这句应该是so..., and so..., that....的结构，

不过还是不确定为什么第二句的 and so 后面的系动词可以省略掉，有明白的nn可以

解释清楚吗？thx.

作者: szgmater 时间: 2009-4-17 07:12

prep选E

难道是什么修辞这样读起来是感觉满好的...

作者: asasasas1 时间: 2009-4-23 11:08

後來想想, 原句(6th floor)是錯的, 這也是為什麼GMAC要出這一題.
如果句子變成:
So dogged were her investigations of the garment industry and so persistent was her lobbying for wage and hour reform that she was first recruited by Gov.
還可以對.
有and做連詞, 不能把一個clause和一個很像獨立主格的東東並列連起
所以句子要改成:
So dogged were her investigations of the garment industry, so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that she was first recruited by Gov.
當兩個clause用and並列, 而謂語含一樣的助動詞(單複不一致也成)+main verb, 可以把and換成comma和助動詞+main verb省.
我相信系詞也是一樣的rule.
這個rule來自Handbook of Good English:
When an auxiliary verb is involved and changes form because of a change in person, the whole compound verb can be omitted as long as the form of the actual verb is the same, as in I am going to jail, you to your just reward, in which the omitted auxiliary verb is are, but the omitted actual verb is going, the same form as in the first clause.

作者: waterpoo 时间: 2009-4-24 21:45

我在想，CE之间的区别在于and前后的内容不同。应该是C的and出问题了

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/)