Q31:

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

1. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

2. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

3. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

4. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

5. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

这道题答案集中在A和E，看了很多高人的帖子，各说各有理，实在有点迷糊。

我记得以前上新东方G班的时候，王海波说过A选项因为是原文句子，所以有先天的优势，句子的重心一般也是由A决定，请问这个说法合理吗？如果这个说法是正确的，那么就应该是A，否则E的感觉还是更像ETS的风格

多谢！

这个题开始我也选的A，仔细想想还是E比较好。

楼主说的那个归纳点对，但是这个原句本身存在逻辑错误，所以在这不适用。

先看看原句，如果用outnumbering...就表示前面动作的伴随结果，（OG11里有那个5

只鸟被放飞，产生。。。的结果的例子。），

而信在什么时候写不会产生这种结果。仔细分析就体会到 E' letters to S

outnumber her letters to ...才是句子主干。

--仅是个人意见

这题我觉得应该是B！

按照which的就近指代，那么E中的which是指代Susan Huntington Dickinson。然后

句子就说SHD这个人是被写出来的。显然不符合逻辑。怎么会选E呢？

应该选E吧。。

这题按照一般的规则的话，E是被排除的，因为which就近指代错误。。

但是按照which是不是能指代这个前面的名词，按照常识是不可能的，所以就跳跃指

代前面的letter了。。

我也知道这个which本来是指代letter的，但是在商务英语中，which用法是很

严格的，即只能就近指代。

基于以上的情况，E选项是不严谨的，指代对象模糊。故因被排除。