65. According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPE, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPE a suntan lotion has.

Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?

(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.

(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than other, the fact that there are different SPEs cannot be ignored.

(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPEs is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.

(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions required the same application procedures in order to work effectively.

(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.

题目好像是说“it really does not matter what SPE a suntan lotion has”－防嗮油里有什么样的SPE无所谓吧，又不是说不重要，B正好说明了SPE有很多种，所以WHAT SPE a suntain lotion has 是有所谓的！！

我这道题目也做错了，同样选了B。
不过回头仔细看了看原文“Therefore, it really does not matter what SPE a

suntan lotion has.”其实原文承认有不同的SPE，只是说lotion里面含有那种SPE

并不重要。所以B里面的“the fact that there are different SPEs cannot be

ignored”，其实并不是原文的error。

吗？

 it really does not matter what SPE a suntan lotion has 怎么翻译?

还有 请NN 再分析以下, 还是没看懂 这道题

是呀，我也觉得难好多。我的正确率也是急剧下降，且起伏不定。

FEIFEI题里的ASSUPMTION比较多，做多了还是启发思路。

best identifies the error in reasoning

不是让你找出结论的错误, 而是找出其中推理的错误

所以举个例子说结论不对是不行的. 要结合提干, 看看推理的错误.

因为In order for a suntan lotion to work,  one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. 所以it really does not matter what SPE a suntan lotion has.

题目中这样的推理是不正确的!

个人感觉就是再讲量和效的关系

文章说，要涂足够的量于皮肤上，需要的话可以重复涂

得出个结论说，SPE的效果没什么用

C：不能因为要涂足够的量，就说SPE这样的效就是没用的。

B：有些人容易晒黑，因此SPE是有效的。文章承认这一点，但这点不是文章推理链的一部分。

文章的推理是说，涂的多－－》SPE无效