Many schools in China claim that they have world class faculties without providing much supporting evidence. Students are often confuesed on what to look for to see if one school has a real stellar group of faculties. Here are some suggestions

The first thing is to look at the research record of the faculties in the top journals recoginized in the world. The following is a list of top journals compiled by NYU faculties. Another area to look is to see if they have served on editorial boards of the top journals

The second thing is to talk to the alumni of the respective schools and see how they rate their professors. These information are very informative and it also tells you what courses you should bid for.

The third thing is to see if they have more impact in the industry.

Leading Journal 

Accounting	Management
Accounting Review	Academy of Management Journal
Journal of Accounting and Economics	Academy of Management Review
Journal of Accounting Research	Administrative Science Quarterly
Review of Accounting Studies	Organization Science
	Strategic Management Journal
Economics
American Economic Review	Marketing
Econometrica	Journal of Consumer Research
Journal of Political Economy	Journal of Marketing Research
Quarterly Journal of Economics	Marketing Science
Review of Economic Studies
	Operations
Finance	Manufacturing and Service Operations Mgmt.
Journal of Business (through Nov. 2006)	Mathematics of Operations Research
Journal of Finance	Operations Research
Journal of Financial Economics
Review of Financial Studies
	Multiple Disciplines
Information Systems	Management Science
Information Systems Research
MIS Quarterly

 

Field Journals

Accounting	Marketing
Contemporary Accounting Research	Quantitative Marketing and Economics
	Journal of Marketing
Economics
American Economic Review Proceedings	Statistics/Math
Journal of Econometrics	Annals of Statistics
Journal of Economic Theory	Biometrika
	Journal of American Statistical Association
Journal of Labor Economics	Mathematical Programming
Journal of Law and Economics	Annals of Applied Probability
Journal of Monetary Economics
Quantitative Marketing and Economics	Psychology
RAND Journal of Economics	Journal of Applied Psychology
Review of Economics and Statistics	Journal of Experimental Psychology (All)
	Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Finance	Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis	Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process
	Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Management	Personality and Social Psychology Review
Journal of International Business Studies	Psychological Bulletin
	Psychological Review
	Psychological Science

A wonderful suggestion!

however, not practical

Academic research is good for MBA students

By Peter Golder and Debanjan Mitra

Published: September 22 2008 03:00 | Last updated: September 22 2008 03:00

Should MBA students care about academic research? If you ask students, many would shout: "No!" But our research* may change their minds.

We have found that when a business school generates more research, its graduating students' salaries go up. In fact, an increase of three single authored articles per year across the school leads to a graduate's starting salary going up by $750.

This amount is above the salary graduates would normally receive based on their quality on entering an MBA programme (as reflected by a high GMAT score or low school acceptance rate) and a business school's resources.

Plus, the dollar gains are multiplied across hundreds of students in a typical MBA programme. Since companies are paying these higher salaries, they are obviously recognising the value of students educated in a more research-oriented environment. Equally important, we also find that when the number of faculty research publications increases, students' evaluations of professors also go up.

We believe there are two main causes of these results. First, researchers can teach students state-of-the-art knowledge, including the latest models, findings and frameworks.

A second cause is that research professors can conceptualise problems, generate logically valid hypotheses and then test them with relevant data and appropriate methods. An understanding of this knowledge-discovery process is essential for students who must "learn how to learn", so that their education remains relevant in a fast-changing world.

Our findings are in contrast with the conclusions of Warren Bennis and James O'Toole, published in Harvard Business Review in 2005. They argue that professors focusing on scientific research have taken over schools to the detriment of students. In their words: "The dirty little secret at most of today's best business schools is that they chiefly serve the faculty's research interests and career goals, with too little regard for the needs of other stakeholders."

They argue that professors without managerial experience "don't know how to analyse the indirect and long-term implications of complex business decisions". Their prescription is a dramatic shift back toward hiring more professors who are skilled in, and orientated toward, business practice.

So, which is it? Is research good or bad for MBA students? As more schools jump on the research bandwagon, it is a serious charge that faculty have hijacked their institutions at the expense of students and society.

Our conclusions are supported by 18 years of US News & World Report data on MBA rankings, students' salaries and other variables such as university endowment and reputation. Our measure of faculty research is the number of annual publications in A-level scientific journals compiled by the University of Texas at Dallas. We analyse our data set using appropriate econometric models.

Since we find a positive relationship between academic research and students' salaries, as well as higher student evaluations of professors in more research-orientated departments, it does not appear that a school's non-faculty stakeholders are hurt by investments in academic research.

All-important business problems are complex. We should not denigrate the importance of managerial judgment and experience that accumulate during a career. But neither should we denigrate the value of a systematic, research- based approach to conceptualising and analysing business situations. In business, there are pros and cons to any path but a research approach can help evaluate the validity of these opinions and reach sounder conclusions.

* Debanjan Mitra and Peter N. Golder (2008), 'Does Academic Research Help or Hurt MBA Programs?' Journal of Marketing, 72 (September), 31-49

Peter Golder is associate professor of marketing NYU Stern School of Business. Debanjan Mitra is assistant professor of marketing at Warrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida.The Soapbox column is open to professors, students and others interested in the future of business schools. To comment on this article go to www.ft.com/soapbox

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

有这么强的师职力量，个人觉得长江办一所Ph.D Program（双语教学）应该比MBA更成功。