Board logo

标题: 请教OG-130 [打印本页]

作者: XIAOHONGYAN    时间: 2008-10-24 07:24     标题: 请教OG-130

130. Bank depositors in US are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals 's bank deposits . An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failure , since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds theri money is secure against failure . If depositros wre more selevive , then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors's money. assumtion. D. The difference in the interests rates paid to depositors by different banks is not a significant factor in bank failures. E. Potentail depositors are able to determine which banks are secure agaisnt failure.

想了半天,没想明白为什么E是假设?将其取非的话,也不能得出结论“银行破产因为政府保障”。倒是觉得D很有道理。

不胜感激 。


作者: EagerBeaver    时间: 2008-10-24 20:41

原題句意為 (1).政府保障所有銀行的存款導致銀行高違約率

(2).因為政府此一行為移除了存戶找尋安全銀行誘因(暗指所有銀行都有政府

安全保障就不去探查誰較安全)

其前提必定為存款人有能力分辨銀行的安全性,不然無分辨能力之下,存款戶

有無意願探查銀行安全都與錢的流向無關(因無法分辨只好隨機),

銀行的違約率也因此與政府行為無關,不會導致升高.

因此 E. Potentail depositors are able to determine which banks are secure agaisnt failure.

正確前提.

D. 選項無關,錯誤.


作者: 3smoviesalon    时间: 2008-10-25 07:18

那么此题不能用取非做么?
作者: VictoriaSuns    时间: 2008-10-25 20:26

D为什么无关啊,取非为什么不行呢?大家帮忙看看啊

作者: sinadragon    时间: 2008-10-26 06:57

取非应该也行吧, 人们没有能力分辨, 从而经济学家的ARGUMENT根本就没有意义了




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2