一、师资力量:1:7<——>1:9
老师和学生的比例数据直接关系到教学质量的好坏,哥伦比亚在这方面略为优胜,一个蛋糕分的人越多,人均分到的量自然就越少,由于考虑到交流问题(要知道,美国的教学非常讲究主动性和自学能力,如果选择比例小的学校的话相对来说学习的资源又更加丰富了,学习效率可以提高的空间更大)。
二、专业设置:
Architecture And Related Services Area, Ethnic, Cultural, And Gender Studies Biological And Biomedical Sciences: Computer And Information Sciences And Support Services: English Language And Literature/Letters: Foreign Languages, Literatures, And Linguistics: History: Education: Mathematics And Statistics: Philosophy And Religious Studies: Physical Sciences: Psychology: Social Sciences: Visual And Performing Arts: | Agriculture, Agriculture Operations, And Related Sciences: Architecture And Related Services: Area, Ethnic, Cultural, And Gender Studies: Biological And Biomedical Sciences: Business, Management, Marketing, And Related Support Services: Communication, Journalism And Related Programs: Computer And Information Sciences And Support Services: Engineering: Engineering Technologies/Technicians: English Language And Literature/Letters: Family And Consumer Sciences/Human Sciences: Foreign Languages, Literatures, And Linguistics: History: Mathematics And Statistics: Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies: Natural Resources And Conservation: Philosophy And Religious Studies: Physical Sciences: Psychology: Public Administration And Social Service Professions: Social Sciences: Visual And Performing Arts: |
由量的分布看来,自然会发现康乃尔大学的专业分布明显较哥伦比亚广泛,这一定程度上也是取决于招生认输的问题,由于康乃尔近年来每年的招生人数基本都在3000人以上,专业的分布自然广,专业的广泛或者由此引出招生人数量的提升,从另一方面来说也让学校的结构更加完善,包括来自世界各地的学生也就更多,那么学生们通过彼此之间的沟通,不仅仅能更大范围地了解学习,更是能了解世界各地的文化。
三、录取情况:
248人申请,录取116人, 68人入学<———>28098人申请,录取6935人,3188人入学
248:116:68——28098:6935:3188,很明显,从比例数据能看出来,申请的难度来说康乃尔更大,然而从机会的基数来说似乎康乃尔也是更大,矛盾就在这里,虽然哥伦比亚的综合排名比康乃尔前,但是对于本科的重视程度还是康乃尔显得更突出,申请的人数达到了最终入学人数的9倍,非常惊人的数据,可想而知其激烈程度。总的来说,康乃尔对本科教育的重视程度远大于哥伦比亚大学,从录取的情况看来,康乃尔依然是遥遥领先,从整体的学习氛围还是硬件条件,相信康乃尔还是比哥伦比亚强很多。
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |