这道题，怎么一个人都没有提起过啊……

 Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were constructed in violation of the city’s building code.

(A) Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were

(B) Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been

(C) Some buildings that the earthquake destroyed and heavily damaged last year have been

(D) Last year the earthquake destroyed or heavily damaged some buildings that have been（B）

(E) Last year some of the buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earth quake had been

答案是B

不明白的是这里的时态。og很确定地说‘This sentence requires two verb tenses：the simple past，were，for the earthquake occurring last year；and the past perfect, had been, for the time prior to that when the buildings were constructed． ’也就是说，OG认为，是建好这些建筑物之后发生了地震。我不明白了，到底哪里有指出说construction是在地震之前呢？如果说是地震之后的重建，也没有什么不对啊？OG的根据到底在什么地方呢？

望同学指点12啦！

初读题目，没有明显的完成时标志，但是题干中的constructed,必然在destroyed and heavily damaged 之前

考点：动词之间的先后顺序。

B C D E候选

C D用现在完成时，错   BE候选

last year放在句首，可能修饰两个动作的时间，引起歧义，E错

选B

首先谢谢楼主的排除解题法。这样的思路，的确很清晰。

可能我没有把我自己的意思表达清楚哦！我不明白的地方就在于如何确认这2组动词之间的先后顺序！

我也同意construct和destroyed or damaged这2件事不可能是同一时间发生，因此必然需要不同的时态。结合本题前后文，应该是某件事情用过去完成时另一件用过去时。

我的问题就是，为什么‘constructed,必然在destroyed or heavily damaged 之前’？为什么不能是之后？到底什么地方可以看出contructed 和 destroyed or damaged 这2件事情的顺序呢？我一直觉得，如果这楼先被地震给弄坏了，再重建，不也是可以的吗？不一定就是先建好了之后再被地震给折腾坏了嘛！

B) Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been

我觉得也有歧义，

1，可能是：Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year///////// had been

2，可能是：Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake///////////// last year had been

last year 可能修饰前面的地震，也可能修饰后面的围建 我觉得。。。

但是E也同样有这个歧义感，请教大家如何理解？ 我错在哪里？