标题: [求助]大全53-54 [打印本页]
作者: micklefuer 时间: 2008-5-22 15:10 标题: [求助]大全53-54
53. According to the National Pasta Association, per-capita consumption of pasta in the United States, which has already been approaching 19 pounds a year, will achieve 30 pounds a year by the twenty-first century.
(A) According to the National Pasta Association, per-capita consumption of pasta in the United States, which has already been approaching 19 pounds a year, will achieve 30 pounds a year by the twenty-first century.
(B) Already approaching 19 pounds a year in the United States, the National Pasta Association predicts that per-capita consumption of pasta will reach 30 pounds a year by the twenty-first century.
(C) The National Pasta association predicts by the twenty-first century that per-capita consumption of pasta in the United States, which is already approaching 19 pounds a year, will reach 30 pounds a year.
(D) By the twenty-first century, the National Pasta Association predicts that per-capita consumption of pasta in the United States, having already approached 19 pounds a year, will reach 30 pounds a year.
(E) According to the National Pasta Association, per-capita consumption of pasta in the United States is already approaching 19 pounds a year and will reach 30 pounds a year by the twenty-first century.
A为什么不对?
54. According to the professor’s philosophy, the antidote to envy is one’s own work, always one’s own work: not thinking about it, not assessing it, but simply doing it.
(A) one’s own work, always one’s own work: not thinking about it, not assessing it, but simply doing it
it 指什么?
作者: MerisaLees 时间: 2008-5-23 20:08
53.
选项A:which has already been approaching 19 pounds a year修饰United States错
54。我觉得是one’s own work
作者: lucyloveandy 时间: 2008-5-25 06:53
53.
选项C:如果把that提到by the twenty-first century 是不是就对了?
The National Pasta association predicts that by the twenty-first century per
-capita consumption of pasta in the United States, which is already
approaching 19 pounds a year, will reach 30 pounds a year.
作者: thankcelester 时间: 2008-5-26 06:42
不对。which refers to US.
作者: summersmiles 时间: 2008-5-30 21:00
我想可能是因为having引导的这个短语修饰的对象不清楚。一个是Association ,
也可能是per-capita consumption。望高人指教
作者: chasemer 时间: 2008-6-2 06:36
同问having already...修饰谁阿?如何判断?如果没有“,”的情况呢?
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |