Board logo

标题: [求助]独立主格 [打印本页]

作者: frankdong    时间: 2004-6-11 12:14     标题: [求助]独立主格


Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed. B. it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors C. appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors D. appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors E. appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who 这里D中stunning evidence做前面句子的同位语, 我想请问的是stunning evidence that human......是不是独立主格 ---- stunning evidence + that从句,构成名词+名词结构? 或者.that从句只是修饰evidence的,说明evidence的内容的? 求助.谢谢.

作者: frankdong    时间: 2004-6-11 12:16

我有点搞不清楚,先谢谢诸位了


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-11 12:16:33编辑过]


作者: hierarch    时间: 2004-6-11 12:18

evidence that是个惯用法,that从句是evidence的同位语从句,说明evidence的内容。


答案是D吗?
作者: frankdong    时间: 2004-6-11 12:21

选D是没错的,但它的作用我可搞不清楚,NN们上哦


作者: hsWang    时间: 2004-6-11 12:22

stunning 是形容词修饰evidence后面的that引导同位语,解释说明evidence


没什么独立主格结构(独立主格结构可不是这个样子的)


GMAT当中是基本比较少独立主格结构的
作者: hsWang    时间: 2004-6-11 12:23

所谓独立主格结构通俗的说是


两个句子中间没连词(有连词就是从句拉),句子主语又不一样(一样,其中一个句子可以改成分词了)


所以把其中一个句子的谓语变成分词形式


最简单的例子


It being sunday, I go out fo a picnic.(独立主格)


It is sunday and I go out for a picnic(用连词的)


这个句子不可能用分词结构的,因为第一个句子的逻辑主语是IT第二是I 不可能一致


原题的stunning是形容次表震惊的




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2