Board logo

标题: [求助]OG 128 [打印本页]

作者: frankdong    时间: 2004-5-27 10:53     标题: [求助]OG 128


128. New hardy varieties of rice show promise of pro­ducing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.
requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
application of commercial fertilizer and irriga­tion that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
irrigation and application of commercial fertil­izer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties
Choice E, the best answer, clearly and grammatically expresses the idea that two costly procedures, irrigation and the applica­tion of... fertilizer, were required by earlier high-yielding varieties of rice. In A, the placement of by earlier... varieties immediately after application of fertilizer suggests that the varieties applied the fertilizer. In B and D, the phrase applica­tion of... fertilizer and irrigation is ambiguous in meaning: it cannot be clearly determined whether applying fertilizer and irrigating are a single operation or two distinct operations. In C, only irrigation--not both irrigation and fertilization--is clearly associated with the earlier... varieties of rice.

D, the phrase applica­tion of... fertilizer and irrigation is ambiguous in meaning: it cannot be clearly determined whether applying fertilizer and irrigating are a single operation or two distinct operations。

这题是考跳跃修饰。可是我觉得D也是修饰明确啊。为什么OG的解释是什么意思? was 的主语是application,application有两样东西:一是commercial fertilizer ,二是irriga­tion。这就说得蛮清楚的啊?

谢谢。

作者: hierarch    时间: 2004-5-27 10:55

答案d中从句中用was,使得从句在语法上可能只修饰irragation,而非原意中要修饰的application, 造成歧义。

作者: frankdong    时间: 2004-5-27 10:57


A of B,后面的动作可说明A也可说明B,这题中WAS用来说明application,不行吗?谢谢。


作者: hierarch    时间: 2004-5-27 11:00

这里的was即可以被理解为修饰application,又可以理解为修饰irragation,造成歧义,所以不好


作者: frankdong    时间: 2004-6-2 23:38

谢谢Hswang的指点!




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/forum/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2