返回列表 发帖

OG-126

126. Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable employees, free of charge, to improve their physical fitness, reduce stress, and learn ways to stop smoking. These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care. Therefore, these programs benefit the company as well as the employee.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly strengthens the conclusion above?

(A) Physical fitness programs are often the most popular services offered to employees.

(B) Studies have shown that training in stress management is not effective for many people.

(C) Regular exercise reduces people's risk of heart disease and provides them with increased energy.

(D) Physical injuries sometimes result from entering a strenuous physical fitness program too quickly. C

(E) Employee assistance programs require companies to hire people to supervise the various programs offered.

比较坍台,这题也出问题,但是做的时候就在犹豫,exercise在文中并未提及,employee assistance programs 完全有可能不包含exercise。所以就觉得与题目无关,故比较之下选了a

请NN看看我的想法错在哪里,谢谢~

收藏 分享

These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care

只要答案中支持该program的上述3个功能(benefits)的任何一个,就是support.

choice A: popular不等同于actually useful

choice B: weaken

choice C:support,心脏病少了,有劲了,病假就少,工作效率就高,公司附的保险自然就低了(long-term),于公于私都有利(benefit the company as well as the employee)

choice D:weaken,而且即便是weakern 也站不住脚,吃饭太快也会噎死,不等于说吃饭有害。

choice E: 细分析:1)公司要多花钱雇人,增加开销,似乎只有利员工而不利公司,跟原文中的公私两利相矛盾。2)当然,这里还可以延伸至比较多雇两个人管理项目的成本增加跟长期来看公司因此而获得的好处相比哪一个更大的问题。严格讲没有明显的weakern或support,而是irrelevant。

programs that help improving physical fitness显然就是exercise,这一点上可以不必多抠字眼

TOP

看到答案的时候自然能很顺利的说服自己C是对的,但是想问在做题时怎么区别选项涉及的内容是否与文章所提及的相关还是超出范围呢?

各位看到的解答下我的困惑把~~

TOP

问的是哪个答案可以加强结论。就是看那个选项对得出结论有帮助喽。

A说的是健身的grogram受欢迎,而对于结论(对公司和员工都有益)并没有起到加强的作用。

建议还是再看OG的解释吧(也是对我自己说).

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看