返回列表 发帖

og12-38

有道题想请教,谢谢啦
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on
Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the
married women’s property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal
rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women’s equal political
and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women’s equal political
and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and
legal rights for women
Parallelism; Rhetorical construction
Mott’s Discourse was a treatise, and it is redundant
and confusing to present her as both publishing
her Discourse and arguing in a treatise, as though
they were two separate things. Th e verb arguing
must be followed by a prepositional phrase
beginning with for, but the verb advocating simply
takes a direct object.
A After published her Discourse … arguing in a
treatise is wordy and imprecise.
B Arguing in a treatise is redundant and
awkward.
C Th e verb advocates does not work
idiomatically with the prepositional phrase
for changes. …
D Th e verbal advocating does not work
idiomatically with the prepositional phrase
for changes. …
E Correct. Th e title of Mott’s publication is
followed by a phrase describing the treatise,
and argued is followed by for.
Th e correct answer is E
收藏 分享

Discourse on Women  是一本书  a treatise是它的同位语  所以AB排除
CDE中 ADVOCATE这个动词和原句中的ARGU不同  而且不能和FOR 搭配  所以选E

TOP

谢谢了

TOP

我觉得,AB错的地方在于
-ing分词形式的短语,是有两种功能的:一是表伴随动作、状态、功能,与句子谓语动作同时发生,逻辑主语等与句子主语
                                         二是表伴随结果,整个句子是原因,导致分词动作产生,无逻辑主语。
显然AB都不是这种用法所以不好。

C D我判断错的根据是,未划线部分是and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
所以前面应该有for和他平行,而C D没有,所以选择E

TOP

LZ,不知道你的具体问题是什么,但我觉得OG的解释应该很到位了,仔细研究一下应该也够了。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看