OG12 SC 36~选项E 我绕圈里了 救命啊~

mousemic

36. Dressed as a man and using the name Robert
Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the fi rst woman to draw
a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in
1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and
was discharged in 1783 because she had become too
ill to serve.
(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged
in 1783 because she had become
(B) 22, was injured three times, while being
discharged in 1783 because she had become
(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged
in 1783, being
(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in
1783 because she was
(E) 22, having been injured three times and
discharged in 1783, being
Parallelism; Logical predication

OG解释E
E having been injured … indicates that all
Sampson’s injuries as well as her discharge
occurred in 1783.

E的错到底在哪~being 不能在这里做伴随状语吗 还是 having been injured 和discarged 不能同在1783年？还有求个分词状语总结帖，我没找着         ( ⊙ o ⊙ )啊！

kenwk

我也刚好总结到这一题，全当讨论吧，拍砖轻轻滴哦, 我认为E项错误如下：

1、【having。。。】在句尾，即使逻辑什么的都成立，它的成分解释不通，说它和【being】并列做句子的伴随状态或修饰主语，那也应该在being前面加个and

2、如OG解释，E项表达的意思是【所有受伤和被释放同时发生在1783年】，但是根据逻辑理解，句子原来的意思是想表达【在1782年到1783年这个时间跨度里】发生了并列的joined, was injured, was discharged三件事情。

3、就是ing在句尾修饰的问题了，being刚开始我也挺纠结的，因为凭技巧和语感判断，肯定是不对的。但是说明到底为什么不对，有点乱，我试着说明，不对请请拍砖啊，哈！

   首先，忽略being这个错误率极高的词，当作V-ing在句尾加逗号考虑

   第一步，考虑作为【伴随状态】，但是这句话有三个谓语并列，所以我觉得做伴随状态是不行，至少，入伍的时候不可能就伴随着伤病。

    第二步，考虑作为整个句子的【结果状语】，这点是我刚开始迷惑的地方，我想着【入伍——受伤——释放】导致了这个伤病的结果，挺顺呀，可是后来想明白了，【入伍——受伤】可以说导致了伤病这个结果，可是和【释放无关】啊，【伤病】只能是【释放】的【原因】，那么结果状语也解释不通了。

   第三步，那么只能考虑就近【修饰名词】了，能修饰谁，按照逻辑只有主语了，如果修饰主语，那离得太远了，跨越了3个并列的句子。

综上所述，being在句尾肯定也不对。

honoluluhono

E本身就是各错选项,
从逻辑表达去分析
be ill ,became ill这是对的,being ill就不对了.B,C,E都不对
为啥,ill这里就是个adj表示状态了,还要一个being,明显多余了
从平行结构去看,D: injured ....and was discharged 明显不平行,
所以A

mousemic

O(∩_∩)O谢谢亲啦

cuixiangmei84

楼上都都说的很清楚了啊，我想从另一个角度来分析

首先作者的intent是 was discharged是因为became ill，所以在不改变intent 的前提下来，问问自己E答案中being "即使”GRAMMA上正确,being ill 能effective 的修饰was discharged吗？

zhanghappy

补充一下：
1. V-ing 做伴随状语， 要求要和主句的动词同时发生，这里have been injured.... 和 be ill 按照题意是有先后顺序的，不可能同时发生。
2.  结果状语： be ill 不是结果而是原因。并且结果状语是没有逻辑主语的。

但是这里OG解释强调的不对的地方是： have been injured表示一直受伤受伤直到1783年discharged了。

aduoyi

我想问到底有没有having been 这种说法，have being呢？？