返回列表 发帖

[求助]gwd-6-14

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again. ???

The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

为何是C而不是A? 多谢

收藏 分享
人生的价值,并不是用时间,而是用深度去衡量的。

请搂主发问的时候注意题目要写清楚。这也是让其他同学更好的学习和分享。

这题A是无关项目,其他就不说了。请看看。

好久没来了,跟各位打个招呼,真是不好意思,太忙了。

欢迎提问,共同进步。

生活是一杯清茶

TOP

c 完善了一下整个论断, 如果在该市长的任期内,减少了很多的高pay 的工作,你怎么可以说整个的average 提高了呢, 只有弥补上这个assumption, 论断才更完整.

TOP

谢谢二位版主的解答。现在清晰了不少。

人生的价值,并不是用时间,而是用深度去衡量的。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看